The fields, in order. This page has no scripts and no forms; nothing you write leaves the page. Print it from your browser and complete it with the cabinet.
B. Claim register (the evidence appendix)
One row per public claim. The code column takes E0 to E5. A claim reaches E5 when a member of the public can reproduce the figure from College Scorecard, IPEDS, or another published federal or state dataset, or when it has been independently audited.
Every figure passes four tests before it enters this register: numerator and denominator named; time window stated; definition changes disclosed; subgroup disaggregation shown.
C. The seven-domain entries
Eight fields per domain, then the ledger fields. Complete every domain, including those where the institution's answer is short.
Domain 1. Admissions transparency and educational purpose
| 1. What the Secretary asks | |
| 2. What the question gets right | |
| 3. What the question assumes | |
| 4. What the institution can prove | |
| 5. What it cannot yet prove | |
| 6. Adverse evidence or contradiction | |
| 7. What it will do (owner, resources, date) | |
| 8. What it will publish, and when | |
| How we define merit in relation to mission | |
| Public admissions criteria (URL) | |
| Date internal protocols were last reviewed | |
| Evidence code (E0–E5) | |
| Responsible executive | |
Domain 2. Free expression, protest, and institutional power
| 1. What the Secretary asks | |
| 2. What the question gets right | |
| 3. What the question assumes | |
| 4. What the institution can prove | |
| 5. What it cannot yet prove | |
| 6. Adverse evidence or contradiction | |
| 7. What it will do (owner, resources, date) | |
| 8. What it will publish, and when | |
| How we distinguish protected expression, prohibited conduct, and institutional speech | |
| Enforcement authority | |
| Most recent consistency review (finding and date) | |
| Evidence code (E0–E5) | |
| Responsible executive | |
Domain 3. Intellectual pluralism and academic governance
| 1. What the Secretary asks | |
| 2. What the question gets right | |
| 3. What the question assumes | |
| 4. What the institution can prove | |
| 5. What it cannot yet prove | |
| 6. Adverse evidence or contradiction | |
| 7. What it will do (owner, resources, date) | |
| 8. What it will publish, and when | |
| How we define intellectual pluralism | |
| Faculty-governance role in this response | |
| Evidence code (E0–E5) | |
| Responsible executive | |
Domain 4. Affordability, value, completion, and repayment
| 1. What the Secretary asks | |
| 2. What the question gets right | |
| 3. What the question assumes | |
| 4. What the institution can prove | |
| 5. What it cannot yet prove | |
| 6. Adverse evidence or contradiction | |
| 7. What it will do (owner, resources, date) | |
| 8. What it will publish, and when | |
| Our definition of educational value | |
| Programs requiring intervention | |
| FVT/GE and STATS submission status (October 1, 2026; January 15, 2027) | |
| Evidence code (E0–E5) | |
| Responsible executive | |
Domain 5. Academic rigor in the age of AI
| 1. What the Secretary asks | |
| 2. What the question gets right | |
| 3. What the question assumes | |
| 4. What the institution can prove | |
| 5. What it cannot yet prove | |
| 6. Adverse evidence or contradiction | |
| 7. What it will do (owner, resources, date) | |
| 8. What it will publish, and when | |
| Learning demonstrated without AI · augmented by AI · that evaluates AI judgment | |
| Assessment redesign baseline | |
| Evidence code (E0–E5) | |
| Responsible executive | |
Domain 6. Research integrity and foreign influence
| 1. What the Secretary asks | |
| 2. What the question gets right | |
| 3. What the question assumes | |
| 4. What the institution can prove | |
| 5. What it cannot yet prove | |
| 6. Adverse evidence or contradiction | |
| 7. What it will do (owner, resources, date) | |
| 8. What it will publish, and when | |
| Section 117 filing status (next deadline January 31, 2027) | |
| Board assurance process and frequency | |
| Evidence code (E0–E5) | |
| Responsible executive | |
Domain 7. National service, workforce need, and institutional mission
| 1. What the Secretary asks | |
| 2. What the question gets right | |
| 3. What the question assumes | |
| 4. What the institution can prove | |
| 5. What it cannot yet prove | |
| 6. Adverse evidence or contradiction | |
| 7. What it will do (owner, resources, date) | |
| 8. What it will publish, and when | |
| Our mission-based public contribution | |
| Program-level workforce evidence (source and period) | |
| Workforce Pell approval status, where applicable | |
| Evidence code (E0–E5) | |
| Responsible executive | |
D. The contradiction ledger
If the institution reports no material contradiction, the response is not published.
E. Board accountability docket
Every commitment has an owner and a date.
F. Certification
We certify that this response distinguishes current performance from proposed action; that material counterevidence was presented to the governing board; that no known adverse finding was omitted solely because it complicated the institution's narrative; and that every dated commitment has an accountable executive owner.
Signatures
| President or chancellor | |
| Board chair | |
| Chief academic officer | |
| Chief financial officer | |
| General counsel | |
| Institutional research officer | |
| Faculty-governance representative | |
| Student representative, where governance permits | |
| Certification date | |
The Public Trust Ledger is an instrument by Sue Mukherjee, Ph.D., Mukherjee & Associates LLC. It is a governance aid and is not legal advice.