The workbook · Version 1

The Ledger workbook

The fields, in order. This page has no scripts and no forms; nothing you write leaves the page. Print it from your browser and complete it with the cabinet.

The instrument explains each field.

A. Posture decision record

Complete once, before any drafting
Institution
Selected posture (holding · decline · collective or system · mission-anchored engagement · full affirmative)
Decision date
Decision authority
Governance process used
Why this posture fits mission and risk profile
What this posture does not resolve
Date for reassessment

B. Claim register (the evidence appendix)

One row per public claim. The code column takes E0 to E5. A claim reaches E5 when a member of the public can reproduce the figure from College Scorecard, IPEDS, or another published federal or state dataset, or when it has been independently audited.

Claim register
ClaimCodeSourceReporting periodData ownerKnown limitationNext update

Every figure passes four tests before it enters this register: numerator and denominator named; time window stated; definition changes disclosed; subgroup disaggregation shown.

C. The seven-domain entries

Eight fields per domain, then the ledger fields. Complete every domain, including those where the institution's answer is short.

Domain 1. Admissions transparency and educational purpose

1. What the Secretary asks
2. What the question gets right
3. What the question assumes
4. What the institution can prove
5. What it cannot yet prove
6. Adverse evidence or contradiction
7. What it will do (owner, resources, date)
8. What it will publish, and when
How we define merit in relation to mission
Public admissions criteria (URL)
Date internal protocols were last reviewed
Evidence code (E0–E5)
Responsible executive

Domain 2. Free expression, protest, and institutional power

1. What the Secretary asks
2. What the question gets right
3. What the question assumes
4. What the institution can prove
5. What it cannot yet prove
6. Adverse evidence or contradiction
7. What it will do (owner, resources, date)
8. What it will publish, and when
How we distinguish protected expression, prohibited conduct, and institutional speech
Enforcement authority
Most recent consistency review (finding and date)
Evidence code (E0–E5)
Responsible executive

Domain 3. Intellectual pluralism and academic governance

1. What the Secretary asks
2. What the question gets right
3. What the question assumes
4. What the institution can prove
5. What it cannot yet prove
6. Adverse evidence or contradiction
7. What it will do (owner, resources, date)
8. What it will publish, and when
How we define intellectual pluralism
Faculty-governance role in this response
Evidence code (E0–E5)
Responsible executive

Domain 4. Affordability, value, completion, and repayment

1. What the Secretary asks
2. What the question gets right
3. What the question assumes
4. What the institution can prove
5. What it cannot yet prove
6. Adverse evidence or contradiction
7. What it will do (owner, resources, date)
8. What it will publish, and when
Our definition of educational value
Programs requiring intervention
FVT/GE and STATS submission status (October 1, 2026; January 15, 2027)
Evidence code (E0–E5)
Responsible executive

Domain 5. Academic rigor in the age of AI

1. What the Secretary asks
2. What the question gets right
3. What the question assumes
4. What the institution can prove
5. What it cannot yet prove
6. Adverse evidence or contradiction
7. What it will do (owner, resources, date)
8. What it will publish, and when
Learning demonstrated without AI · augmented by AI · that evaluates AI judgment
Assessment redesign baseline
Evidence code (E0–E5)
Responsible executive

Domain 6. Research integrity and foreign influence

1. What the Secretary asks
2. What the question gets right
3. What the question assumes
4. What the institution can prove
5. What it cannot yet prove
6. Adverse evidence or contradiction
7. What it will do (owner, resources, date)
8. What it will publish, and when
Section 117 filing status (next deadline January 31, 2027)
Board assurance process and frequency
Evidence code (E0–E5)
Responsible executive

Domain 7. National service, workforce need, and institutional mission

1. What the Secretary asks
2. What the question gets right
3. What the question assumes
4. What the institution can prove
5. What it cannot yet prove
6. Adverse evidence or contradiction
7. What it will do (owner, resources, date)
8. What it will publish, and when
Our mission-based public contribution
Program-level workforce evidence (source and period)
Workforce Pell approval status, where applicable
Evidence code (E0–E5)
Responsible executive

D. The contradiction ledger

If the institution reports no material contradiction, the response is not published.

Contradiction ledger
Public claimPlausible contradictionEvidence reviewedRequired actionOwner and date

E. Board accountability docket

Every commitment has an owner and a date.

Docket
CommitmentBaselineResponsible executiveGoverning committeeResourcesMilestone datesRisk statusPublic reporting date

F. Certification

We certify that this response distinguishes current performance from proposed action; that material counterevidence was presented to the governing board; that no known adverse finding was omitted solely because it complicated the institution's narrative; and that every dated commitment has an accountable executive owner.

Signatures
President or chancellor
Board chair
Chief academic officer
Chief financial officer
General counsel
Institutional research officer
Faculty-governance representative
Student representative, where governance permits
Certification date